Cognitive puzzles have always intrigued and challenged our minds, pushing us to think outside the box. Today, we have an interesting brain teaser featuring fried eggs with an unknown number in one corner. The big question is: What number should replace the question mark?
At first glance, this puzzle might seem straightforward, but many people struggle to find the correct answer. Let’s break it down step by step, analyze common mistakes, and finally arrive at the right solution.
Try to Solve It First!
Before we dive into the solution, take a moment to analyze the image. Each fried egg pair or grouping has a number next to it, except for the last one. Your challenge is to figure out the pattern behind these numbers and determine the missing value.
So, what’s your answer? 12? 24? Something else? Let’s see if you’re right.
Common Mistakes People Make
Puzzles like this often trick people into seeing patterns that don’t actually exist or missing key details. Here are some common mistakes:
- Assuming the numbers represent the total number of yolks
Many people assume the number is simply the count of yolks in each grouping. However, if that were the case, the values would be 2, 3, 2, and 3—this doesn’t match the numbers given. - Thinking the numbers count the number of egg whites
Some might assume the numbers are based on the number of egg whites. However, we see cases where eggs are overlapping, making this unreliable. - Overcomplicating the pattern
Some puzzle solvers jump straight to complex mathematical operations before checking simpler patterns.
If you made one of these mistakes—don’t worry! Now let’s walk through the correct method to solve this.
Video : Which Number Replaces The Question Mark ??
Step-by-Step Solution: Finding the Pattern
Let’s examine the numbers given: 12, 23, and 22. Each number corresponds to a different grouping of eggs. But what do they mean?
Step 1: Count the Yolk Pairs and Their Positioning
Looking closely at each plate, we see that:
- 12 → Two yolks in one egg white.
- 23 → Three yolks in one egg white + two yolks in another egg white.
- 22 → Two yolks in each of two egg whites.
From this, we see that the numbers are NOT just counting yolks or egg whites alone.
Step 2: Understanding the Number Formation
Observing the pattern, the first digit of the number corresponds to the number of yolks in the first egg, and the second digit corresponds to the number of yolks in the second egg.
- 12 → (1 yolk in the first egg, 2 yolks in the second egg)
- 23 → (2 yolks in the first egg, 3 yolks in the second egg)
- 22 → (2 yolks in the first egg, 2 yolks in the second egg)
Step 3: Identifying the Last Number
Now, let’s apply this pattern to the final grouping, which contains 3 yolks in one egg white and no additional egg.
Following the same rule, the first digit is 3 (yolks in the first egg), and since there is no second egg, we assume the second digit is 1.
Thus, the missing number should be 13.
Final Answer: 13
After carefully analyzing the pattern, we conclude that the correct number to replace the question mark is 13. The first digit represents the number of yolks in the first egg, and the second digit represents the number of yolks in the second egg.
Did you get it right? If not, don’t worry! The key takeaway is to pay attention to patterns rather than just counting random elements.
Video : Egg Riddles
Join the Discussion!
Did you find a different pattern? Do you enjoy solving logic puzzles like this one? Share your answers and thoughts in the comments below!
If you liked this challenge, try tackling more puzzles to sharpen your logical thinking and pattern recognition skills. The more you practice, the better you get at spotting hidden patterns and solving tricky problems quickly.
So, what are you waiting for? Test your brain with another puzzle today!
Heavily-Tattooed Woman Says It’s “Not Fair” That She Can’t Get A Job
Following a woman’s accusation that TJ Maxx was discriminating against her due to her appearance, a subsequent instance involving a job rejection at the store has generated controversy. 23-year-old Ash Putnam, who goes by @ashxobrien on TikTok, talked about how she was turned down for a part-time job at the store because of her body piercings and tattoos.
Putnam claims that after applying for the job, she got an email a few weeks later rejecting her application. Disappointed by the information, she vented her annoyance on TikTok and sparked a discussion on discrimination in employment.
Putnam’s initial grievance was with the impersonality of getting an email rejection instead of a call. Even though this is standard procedure for big businesses, she thought it was disrespectful considering how hard she worked to apply for the position.
When Putnam went to her neighborhood TJ Maxx to personally find out why she was rejected, a staff member informed her that she didn’t have enough experience for the role. Despite the employee’s insistence to the contrary, she suspected that her tattoos had a big influence on the choice.
Putnam stressed that, despite her unhappiness, she wasn’t necessarily in need of the work and was just looking for extra money to help her pay off debt faster. She thought it was unjust, though, that her tattoos appeared to be a deciding factor in her employability.
Putnam has obvious tattoos of images associated with Satanism, including a Leviathan Cross and a goat that symbolizes the god Baphomet. Thousands of TikTok users commented on her post, implying that her tattoos probably affected the decision, even though it’s unclear whether hiring supervisors noticed them when she applied.
Visible tattoos, according to some reviewers, may be viewed as unprofessional, particularly in jobs where employees interact with customers like those at TJ Maxx. Others brought out the difficulty of finding a job for young folks without any prior work experience if employers value experience over potential.
The event brought up more general concerns about how society views physical alterations and employment procedures. Putnam questioned why having a tattoo should prevent someone from getting a job, given that many tattoo bearers are quite skilled workers.
Putnam’s tattoos may not have had a direct impact on her rejection, but the event brings attention to the ongoing discussion over appearance-based discrimination in the workplace. It’s critical to think about how hiring procedures may be more inclusive and equal for all candidates, regardless of appearance, as the conversation continues.
Leave a Reply