People often have a habit of freezing celebrities in their minds when they were at the peak of their fame, forgetting that they are human beings who age like everyone else. In addition, the widespread use of cosmetic surgery and fillers today further distorts our perception of how people naturally look as they age. However, fortunately, there are still some celebrities who remind us that there is absolutely nothing wrong with looking different as we age compared to our younger years.
Justine proudly embraces her age.
If you were a kid or teenager in the ’80s and ’90s, you probably remember Justine as Mallory Keaton from the popular TV show Family Ties. But after that, she shifted her focus from acting to working behind the scenes. Now, she’s a successful author and director. In a recent interview, the actress, now 57 years old, came back into the spotlight to share an important message with all women concerned about getting older.
When she reached her 40s, people considered her “old.”
Justine didn’t think about getting older until she had to search for something online. She wanted to research and refresh her memory about something that happened during her fame. But when she typed her name, Justine Bateman, into Google, the search autocomplete suggested: “looks old.” This happened when she was only around 40 years old.
That revelation actually boosted her self-confidence.
When questioned whether she had ever considered cosmetic procedures, Justine explained that plastic surgery would cause her to “lose all of her authority.” She expressed contentment with her current appearance and emphasized that she finds satisfaction in the visible signs that indicate she has evolved into a different individual from her younger self.
She even decided to write a book about her experiences.
Justine doesn’t criticize those who choose to undergo beauty treatments to appear younger, but she does express a feeling of sadness for them. She explains that she feels sorry for those so preoccupied with the idea of fixing their appearance that it distracts them from focusing on the meaningful aspects of life. In 2021, Justine Bateman released a book titled “Face: One Square Foot of Skin,” which addresses this significant issue.
Women shouldn’t spend too much time fixating on their looks.
Justine shared some exciting news: “There’s absolutely nothing wrong with your face!” she wrote as the caption for an Instagram post promoting her book. Justine draws from her experiences to illustrate society’s obsession with how women’s faces transform as they age. When asked about the beauty of aging, Justine firmly states that she doesn’t care about others’ opinions. She confidently asserts, “I think I look rad. My face represents who I am. I like it, and that’s basically the end of the road.”
Several notable figures in the public eye have made the conscious choice to embrace natural aging, rejecting the pressure to undergo cosmetic interventions. One such individual is Cameron Diaz, who boldly opted to age gracefully without relying on Botox or similar treatments. After an unpleasant experience where Botox altered her appearance in an unexpected manner, Diaz decided to embrace her natural features and allow the aging process to unfold authentically.
Preview photo credit Invision / Invision / East News, Invision / Invision / East News
Synaptic Information Storage Capacity Measured With Information Theory
Ever wondered just how much data your brain can hold? We often compare the brain to a supercomputer, but what if that comparison isn’t just a metaphor—it’s literal? Deep within your brain, at the junctions where neurons meet, lies an extraordinary form of biological storage: the synapse. And thanks to breakthroughs in information theory, we’re beginning to quantify its staggering capacity.
In this article, we’ll dive into how synaptic storage works, how scientists measure it, and why this knowledge could shape the future of data storage—from artificial intelligence to DNA-based memory.
What Are Synapses and Why Are They Important?
Think of neurons as the brain’s messengers. But without synapses—the gaps between them where signals are transmitted—those messages would go nowhere. A synapse is where the magic happens: it’s the space where one neuron sends a chemical or electrical signal to another, sparking thoughts, memories, movements, and more.
Now here’s the kicker: each of these tiny junctions doesn’t just pass along data—it stores it.
Your brain has about 86 billion neurons, and each one can form around 1,000 synapses. That’s a total of roughly 125 trillion synapses buzzing away in your brain, constantly sending and receiving signals. These connections form the foundation of your memories, knowledge, and perception.
Measuring Synaptic Storage with Information Theory
To understand how synapses store information, scientists turn to information theory—a branch of mathematics that deals with encoding, decoding, and compressing data. Think of it like analyzing how much a hard drive can hold, but on a biological scale.
Video : 2-Minute Neuroscience: Synaptic Transmission
Each synapse, as it turns out, can store up to 4.7 bits of information. That might not sound like much until you consider the scale:
- 1 bit is a single piece of binary data (a 0 or 1)
- 4.7 bits per synapse × 125 trillion synapses = over 500 trillion bits of potential storage
Translated into digital terms, your brain can theoretically store more data than the entire internet—all in a compact, low-energy package powered by biology.
The Brain’s Efficiency: Powering Trillions of Connections
Here’s something even more mind-blowing: while your laptop heats up and guzzles electricity, your brain handles all of this complex storage and processing using roughly 20 watts of power—that’s about the same as a dim light bulb.
This insane efficiency is what’s inspiring researchers to build neural networks and deep learning systems that mimic the brain. If computers could process and store data like synapses do, we’d have faster, smarter, and greener technology.
Artificial Intelligence and Synaptic Models
The field of AI, especially machine learning and deep learning, borrows heavily from how the brain processes and stores information. Artificial neural networks use layers of interconnected nodes (inspired by neurons) to simulate learning.
But here’s where it gets interesting: researchers are now using real data about synaptic information capacity to refine these systems. The goal? To build AI models that are more human-like, not just in intelligence but in efficiency and adaptability.
Imagine a future where your smartphone thinks and stores information with the same elegance as your brain. That future isn’t science fiction—it’s science.
Beyond the Brain: DNA as the Ultimate Storage Device
While the brain remains the pinnacle of biological storage, it’s not the only game in town. Enter DNA, nature’s original information vault.
DNA doesn’t just code for life—it can be used to store digital data. And we’re not talking small files here. A single gram of DNA can hold up to 215 petabytes of data. That’s 215 million gigabytes—enough to store every photo, song, and document you’ve ever owned, plus millions more.
In fact, researchers have already done it. In one groundbreaking study, scientists encoded a 52,000-word book into synthetic DNA. They converted the digital content into binary (0s and 1s), then translated those digits into DNA’s four-letter alphabet: A, T, G, and C. The result? A physical strand of DNA holding a complete, retrievable digital file.
Why DNA Storage Matters for the Future
Traditional storage devices—hard drives, SSDs, even cloud servers—have physical limits. They degrade over time and take up massive amounts of space. DNA, on the other hand, is incredibly compact, durable, and stable for thousands of years if stored properly.
If scaled correctly, DNA storage could revolutionize how we preserve knowledge. Imagine backing up the entire contents of the Library of Congress on something no bigger than a sugar cube. That’s the level we’re talking about.
Video : How Your Brain Remembers: Neurons & Synapses Explained!
Bridging Biology and Technology
What’s exciting is how these two areas—brain synapses and DNA storage—are starting to intersect. Both are nature’s proof that small-scale systems can handle mind-blowing amounts of data. As scientists continue to decode these systems using information theory, they’re finding ways to integrate them into technology.
It’s not about replacing computers with brains or turning DNA into a USB drive. It’s about learning from nature’s most efficient designs to build the next generation of computing and storage systems.
Conclusion: Reimagining Storage in a Biological World
Your brain’s 125 trillion synapses silently store and process more information than entire server farms, all while sipping on 20 watts of energy. Meanwhile, DNA—the code of life—is showing us how to pack massive libraries of data into microscopic strands.
By measuring synaptic storage capacity with information theory, we’re not just understanding the brain better—we’re laying the foundation for a new era of intelligent, efficient technology.
The takeaway? Nature has already solved problems we’re only beginning to understand. And the more we study it, the closer we get to unlocking the true potential of both our minds and our machines.
Leave a Reply